LegalEagle101
Okay, so like… can the gov actually ban TikTok without violating our First Amendment rights? I mean, isn’t freedom of speech kinda the point?
LegalEagle101
Okay, so like… can the gov actually ban TikTok without violating our First Amendment rights? I mean, isn’t freedom of speech kinda the point?
CaseClosed
The First Amendment is all about speech, but gov says it’s about national security. Rock, meet hard place.
CivicCrusader
Remember when the Supreme Court ruled on that California law banning violent video games? Similar vibes. Gotta meet strict scrutiny standards!
ViralVibes
Imagine: TikTokers taking it to the Supreme Court. Content creators as freedom fighters!
DeepDiver42
Legal deets: Gov needs a legit reason, and it must be narrowly tailored. Can’t just YOLO and ban stuff.
MillennialJurist
TBH, it all depends on if TikTok’s classified as a public forum. If yes, banning = HUGE storm. If no, well…
TechLawSavvy
Remember, TikTok = private platform. But if gov intervenes, it’s like saying Twitter bans violate ‘free speech’—which they don’t.
RadicalRambler
If BC can ban books/youths, can TikTok be next? Not apples to apples, but much?
GenZLawyer
I’m low-key obsessed with how this blends tech policy and constitutional law. Imagine dissecting this in class!
SupremeMemes
TikTok’s legal fight = modern-day revolution but make it digital:sparkles:
FreeSpeechStan
Fun fact: Gov can’t just say ‘national security.’ Needs evidence. Court loves receipts!
MemeJuris
If TikTok goes, where do we meme next? Holla back, legal eagles, 'cause that’s my real concern.
SnarkyScholar
TikTok’s algorithms are a whole other beast. Does control over content = censorship?
ByteSized
If banning TikTok isn’t content-neutral, could be Big Trouble in Little Constitution!